Swiss Re shares dropped 7.5% on Friday after the world’s second-largest reinsurer announced a new profit target that fell short of market expectations.
The Zurich-based company said it was aiming for group net income of $4.5 billion next
year, up from an expected $4.4 billion in 2025, but less than the $4.81 billion forecast by analysts, according to a consensus compiled by Visible Alpha.
Swiss Re’s stock was the worst performer on the Stoxx Europe 600 Index .SXIP, which was 0.4% lower. At 1211 GMT, its stock was 5.6% lower at 130.75 Swiss francs.
Analysts were also disappointed with the size of Swiss Re’s new $500 million share buyback, the company’s first since it completed a 1 billion Swiss franc ($1.3 billion) scheme in 2020.
“Today’s statements by Swiss Re are generally somewhat below expectations, particularly with regard to the 2026 profit target and the volume of the planned share buybacks,” said Zuercher Kantonalbank analyst Georg Marti.
CEO Andreas Berger defended the profit target, saying market conditions were not easy.
“Could we do more? Perhaps,” he said. “But I don’t want to squeeze the lemon dry.”
Swiss Re was also approached every week with potential takeover targets, he added.
“We are open to inorganic opportunities,” Berger told analysts at its investor day. “I’d like to keep some powder dry.”
Earlier on Friday, Swiss Re, which competes with Germany’s Munich Re, said it was now targeting net income of $1.7 billion from its life and health segment next year, after dropping its 2025 target for $1.6 billion last month.
It said it had completed a review of its underperforming portfolios in Australia, Israel and South Korea, and that it expected fourth-quarter pretax earnings to be reduced by $250 million following an “assumption update.”
Watch More Image Part 2 >>>
And unlike Trump’s first term, the latest changes may be harder to reverse and result in l
ng-lasting impacts on public health and the economy. Over the past year, the EPA has surpassed the staff and program cuts made during a similar period last time. It has also launched more pollution control rollbacks, with EPA Admini
strator Lee Zeldin proudly boasting about “the greatest day of deregulation our nation has seen.”
The EPA has been able to make such quick work this time around because it’s breaking historical precedent and testing the legal boundaries of administrative and environmental laws, according to interviews with more
than a dozen current and former EPA staffers, advocates, historians, scientists and legal experts.
Rescinding the endangerment finding is the most consequential change for an EPA that’s been reoriented around sweeping deregulation. It marks the reversal of a key scientific determination — that greenhouse gases are harmful — supporting a swath of federal climate policy to curb emissions from vehicles and industrial sources. The previous Trump
administration had planned a public debate of climate science, at the time considered the first step in challenging the finding, but abandoned the effort before it officially began.