Another Near Miss for Insurance Industry

 The recent 15-hour or so outage at Amazon Web Services (AWS) again raised questions about the potential for syst



emic loss to the cyber insurance market, but losses from the temporary lapse in cloud services are not likely to be catastrophic.


The event was classified as a “moderate incident” for the insurance industry, said cyber analytics provider CyberCube.


“This AWS outage underscores systemic cloud services provider concentration risk. With disruptions exten


ding 15 to 16 hours and most waiting periods in the 8- to 12-hour range, this outage could represent a moderate c


yber (re)insurance event,” the firm said in a blog, which also used the outage as a reminder to review cloud-provider dependencies in portfolios.


Insurance may be impacted by system failure contingency business i


disruption (CBI) coverage, and there is potential for incident response and data restoration costs, CyberCube added.


Jason M. Schweigert, vice president, forensic accounting at Sedgwick, said there are at least a couple of lessons from the event.


“Diversify your cloud platforms to avoid complete interruption when a provider has a problem,” he said, adding a review 


of policy language is in order to know coverage triggers and waiting periods.


Related: Amazon Says All Cloud Services Restored After 15-Hour Outage


Watch More Image Part 2 >>>

For policyholders, insurance policies typically have waiting periods (ranging from 8-24 hours) before business in


terruption losses can be tallied, from the start of the network disruption.


Ryan Griffin, a partner in the U.S. financial lines and special risk team at McGill and Partners, says the AWS outage will be another “near miss” for the insurance industry


ustry, like the cyber events of CrowdStrike and Change Healthcare were, for the most part.


“But we can only have so many near misses without it becoming significant,” added Griffin, who is focused on cyber at McGill.


The concern may be less about catastrophic payouts than about a slow erosion of confidence in products that policyholders find too complex or unresponsive.


“Until these police become far more responsive from a business interruption calculation standpoint—whether we’re talking parametric or other mechanism—it’s probably unlikely that there’s going to be a ‘big one,'” McGill said.


The take-up of parametric solutions has lagged and warranties are not adapting policies to include a parametric element


t, so clients are currently faced with a burdensome insurance recovery. The proof of loss process is “not fun…they are no piece of cake,” Griffin explained


. In fact, it can discourage some clients from filing a claim.


“We have this idea of ​​coverage,” he said, “but when you actually try to recover and work through what’s required t


o recover under these coverage extensions, it’s a lot of work.” For many publications, especially smaller businesses, the co


st and effort of recovery often outweighs the benefit. Meanwhile, Fortune 500 firms may weather short outages with minimal impact.

Đăng nhận xét

Mới hơn Cũ hơn

Support me!!! Thanks you!

Join our Team